Page 83 - GESTIÓN TERRITORIAL Y MANEJO DE RECURSOS NATURALES
P. 83

Red Ecosistemas Tropicales, Investigación y Desarrollo             83






                 (Eds.), A changing world. Challenges for landscape   Kolasa,  J.  (2005).  Complexity,  system  integration,  and
                 research (pp. 47- 62). Germany: Springer.             susceptibility to change: biodiversity connection.
           Intergovernmental  Panel  on  Climate  Change  (2001a).     Ecological complexity, 2, 431-442.
                 Climate  change  2001, impacts,  adaptation,  and   Levi, S. (2006). Geografía humana y geomática. A Boletim

                 vulnerability, contribution of working group II to the   goiano de geografia, 26, 1.
                 third assessment report of the intergovernmental   Liu, J., Dietz, T., Carpenter, S. R., Folke, C., Alberti, M.,
                 panel on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge         Redman, C. L.,  Schneider,  S. H.,  Ostrom,  E.,

                 University Press.                                     Pell, A. N., Lubchenco, J., Taylor, W. W., Ou-
           Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2001b).          yang, Z., Deadman, P., Kratz, T. & Provencher,
                 Summary for policy makers: working group II: clima-   W. (2007). Coupled human and natural systems.
                 te change 2001: impacts and adaptation. Cam-          Ambio, 36 (8), 639-649.
                 bridge: Cambridge University Press.            Manson, S. M. (2001). Simplifying complexity: a review

           Janssen, M. A., Anderies, J. M. & Ostrom, E. (2007). Ro-    of complexity theory. Geoforum, 32 (3), 405-14.
                 bustness of social-ecological systems to spatial   Manson, S. M. & O’Sullivan, D. (2006). Complexity theory
                 and temporal variability.  Society and natural re-    in the study of space and place. Environment and

                 sources, 20, 1-16.                                    planning, 38 (4), 677-692.
           Kay, J. J., Regierb, H. A., Boylec, M. & Francisa, G. (1999).   Mark, D. M. (2000). Geographic information science: cri-
                 An ecosystem approach for sustainability: addres-     tical issues in an emerging cross-disciplinary re-
                 sing the challenge of complexity. Futures, 31(7),     search domain. URISA Journal, 12, 1.
                 721-742.                                       Matthews, R. & Selman, P. (2006). Landscape as a focus

           Kay, J. (2001). Ecosystems, science and sustainability. En   for  integrating  human  and  environmental  pro-
                 Ulgiati, S., Brown, M. T., Giampietro, M., Heren-     cesses. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57 (2),
                 deen, R. & Mayumi, K. (Eds.). Proceedings of the      199-212.

                 international workshop: advances in energy studies:   McAlpine, C. A., Ryan, J. G., Seabrook, L., Thomas, S.,
                 exploring supplies, constraints and strategies (pp.   Dargusch, P. J., Syktus, J. I., PielkeSr, R. A., Etter,
                 319-328). Porto Venere, Italy: SG Editoriali.         A. E, Fearnside, P. M. & Laurance, W. F. (2010).
           Kauffman, S. (1995). At home in the universe: the search for   More  than  CO2:  a  broader  paradigm  for  ma-
                 the laws of self-organization and complexity. New     naging climate change and variability to avoid

                 York: Oxford University Press.
           Kienberger, S. & Zeil, P. (2006).  Vulnerability  assessment
                 and global change monitoring: the role of remo-

                 te sensing  -potential and constraints for  decision
                 support. 31st International Symposium on Remote
                 Sensing for the Environment. St. Petersburg, Russia.
                                                                 Universidad Autónoma de Chiapas
   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88