Page 82 - GESTIÓN TERRITORIAL Y MANEJO DE RECURSOS NATURALES

82 Gestión Territorial y Manejo de Recursos Naturales

Cadenasso, M. L., Pickett, S. T. A. & Grove, J. M. (2006). Füssel, H. M. (2007). Vulnerability: a generally applicable
Dimensions of ecosystem complexity: heteroge- conceptual framework for climate change re-
neity, connectivity, and history. Ecological comple- search. Global environmental change, 17, 155-167.
xity, 3, 1-12. Giampietro, M. & Ramos-Martin, J. (2005). Multi-scale

Carmel, Y. & Naveh, Z. (2002). The paradigm of landsca- integrated analysis of sustainability: a methodo-
pe and the paradigm of ecosystem - Implications logical tool to improve the quality of narratives.
for land planning and management in the medite- International journal of global environmental issues,

rranean region. Journal of mediterranean ecology, 5, 119-141.
3 (2), 35-46. Gibson, C. C., Ostrom, E. & Ahn, T.K. (2000). The concept
Cundill, G., Fabricius, C. & Marti, N. (2005). Foghorns to of scale and the human dimensions of global chan-
the future: using knowledge and transdisciplinarity ge: a survey. Ecological economics, 32, 217-239.
to navigate the uncharted waters of complex social- Gibson, C., Ostrom, E. & Evans, T. P. (2002). Scaling issues

ecological systems. Ecology and society, 10 (2), 8. with social data in integrated assessment mode-
Chapin, F. S., Folke, C. & Kofinas, G. P. (2009). A framework ling. Integrated assessment, 3 (2-3), 135-150.
for understanding change. En Chapin, F. S., Kofi- Goodchild, M. F. & Janelle, D. G. (2004). Thinking spatially

nas, G. P. & Folke, C. (Eds.), Principles of ecosystem in the social sciences. En Goodchild, M. F. & Jane-
stewardship. New York: Springer Verlag. lle, D. G. (Eds.), Spatially integrated social science.
Easterling, W. & Kok, K. (2002). Emergent properties of New York: Oxford University Press.
scale in global environmental modeling - are the- Goodchild, M. F. & Janelle, D. G. (2010). Toward critical
re any? Integrated assessment, 3 (2-3), 233-246. spatial thinking in the social sciences and humani-

Farina, A. (2005). Complexity, space and cognition: a puzzle ties. GeoJournal, 75, 3-13.
for the new science of landscape: sustainable deve- Green, D. G. & Sadedin, S. (2005). Interactions matter-
lopment: new research. New York: Nova Science complexity in landscapes and ecosystems. Ecolo-

Publisher. gical complexity, 2, 117-130.
Farina, A. (2006). Introduction to landscape ecology. Prin- Hovelsrud, G. K., Amundsen, H. & West, J. (2008). Unders-
ciples and methods in landscape ecology. Lands- tanding community vulnerability and adaptation:
cape series, 3, 1-52. methodological challenges in analyzing coupled so-
Folke, C. (2007). Social-ecological systems and adaptive go- cial-ecological systems. Paper presented at the 2008

vernance of the commons. Ecol Res., 22, 14-15. Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of
Global Environmental Change – Long-term policies:
Governing social-ecological change.

Hunziker, M., Buchecker, M. & Hartig, T. (2007). Space
and place - two aspects of the human-landscape
relationship. En Kienast, F., Wildi, O. & Ghosh, S.
Universidad Autónoma de Chiapas