Page 109 - UN ANÁLISIS CRITICO

109

Sewell, D. O. (1996). “The dangers of decentralization according to Prud´homme: some further aspects”. World Bank Research
Observer, Vol. 11, No.1, pp. 143-150.
Shah, A. (1997). “Fiscal Federalism and Macroeconomic Governance: For Better or Worse?” Working Paper of the World Bank,
No. 1, pp. 1-41.

Stein, E. (1998). “Which type of intergovernmental Transfers Should Countries Adopt?”. The Latin American Economic Policies,
BID, No. 1, pp. 1-22.
Tanzi, V. (1995). “Fiscal Federalism and Decentralization: A Review of some Efficiency and Macroeconomic Aspects”. Annual

Conference on Development Economics, No. 1, pp. 295-316.
Tiebout, C. M. (1956). “A pure theory of local expenditures”. The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 64, No. 5, pp. 416-424.
Webb, S. B y Gonzales, C. (2004). “Negociación de un nuevo pacto fiscal en México”. Gestión y Política Pública, Vol. 13, No.
3, pp. 689-731.
Weingast, B. R. (2007). “Second Generation Fiscal Federalism: Implications for Decentralized Democratic Governance and

Economic Development”. Stanford Discussion Draft, No. 1, pp. 1-71.
Weingast, B. R. (2009). “Second Generation Fiscal Federalism: The Implications of Fiscal Incentives”. Journal of Urban Econo-
mics, Vol. 65, No. 3, pp. 279-293.

Wildasin, D. E. (1997). “Externalities and Bailouts: Hard and Soft Budget Constraints in Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations”.
Policy Research Working Paper Series of the World Bank, No. 1843, pp. 1-35.
Wray, L. R. (2012). Modern Money Theory: A Primer on Macroeconomics for Sovereign Monetary Systems. London, United King-
dom: Palgrave, McMillan.

Universidad Autónoma de Chiapas