Page 157 - UN ANÁLISIS CRITICO
P. 157
LA DEUDA PÚBLICA DEL ESTADO DE CHIAPAS.
ELMAR MORALES SÁNCHEz 157
Castells, A. (1999). “Haciendas locales, autonomía y responsabilidad fiscal”. Gestión y Política Pública, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 277-297.
Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos (1917) (1998). Segunda Edición, Chiapas, México: Editorial Edysis.
Crivelle, E. y Staal, K. (2013). “Size, Spillovers and Soft Budget Constraints”. International Tax and Public Finance, Vol. 20, No.
2, pp. 338-356.
Hernández-Trillo, F., Díaz C., A. and Gamboa G., R. (2002). “Fiscal Decentralization in México: The Bailout Problem”. Research
Network Working Paper IADB, No. R-447, pp. 1-54.
Hurtado, C. L. y Zamarripa, G. (2013). “Deuda Subnacional: un análisis del caso mexicano”. Documento de investigación FUN-
DEF. A.C, No. 002, pp. 1-180.
Kornai, J., Maskin, E. and Roland, G. (2003). “Understanding the Soft Budget Constraint”. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol.
41, pp. 1095–1136.
Musgrave, R. A. (1959). The theory of public finance: a study in public economy. New York, U.S.A.: McGraw-Hill.
Oates, W. (2005). “Toward a Second-Generation Theory of Fiscal Federalism”. International Tax and Public Finance, Vol. 12,
No. 4, pp. 349-373.
Qian, Y. and Roland, G. (1998). “Federalism and the Soft Budget Constraint”. American Economic Review, Vol. 88, pp. 1143–1162.
Tiebout, C. (1956). “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures”. The Journal of Political Economics, Vol. 64, No. 5, pp. 416-424.
Wildasin, D. E. (1997). “Externalities and Bailouts: Hard and Soft Budget Constraints in Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations”.
Policy Research Working Paper Series of the World Bank, No. 1843, pp. 1-35.
Universidad Autónoma de Chiapas